[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090501113533.GB10704@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 04:35:33 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Alex Buell <alex.buell@...ted.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No NCQ support on X61s Ultrabay? (Intel ICH8 SATA controller
question)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:21:08PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> I'm suspecting that that Ultrabay slot might be using the PATA ports on
> the chipset, with a PATA-SATA bridge chip or something. I haven't seen
> an Intel chipset with some SATA ports using AHCI and some in PIIX mode
> before, the ones I've seen with both had the PIIX mode driving PATA
> ports. If it is indeed bridged through PATA on that laptop, there's no
> way you're going to get any NCQ support on that slot.
>
> I don't know why Lenovo would do that, as it would kind of cripple SATA
> drives in that slot, but hardware people do some bizarre things
> sometimes..
I have to agree with Robert. If you look at the ich8 data sheet
(313056-003), the mobile version has 3 ATA ports and 1 IDE port "that
can be electrically isolated". See pages 41, 43, and 50-51. on page 41,
it says the IDE port has "Tri-state modes to enable swap bay".
So I don't blame Lenovo for hooking up the Ultrabay slot using the IDE
port. They were pretty much told to do it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists