linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/27] asm-generic: add a NOMMU uaccess.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49FAED34.5000701@monstr.eu>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2009 14:38:12 +0200
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/27] asm-generic: add a NOMMU uaccess.h

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> +#ifndef __put_user
>>> +#define __put_user(x, ptr)                             \
>>> +({                                                     \
>>> +       int __pu_err = 0;                               \
>>> +       typeof(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);                  \
>>> +       switch (sizeof (*(ptr))) {                      \
>>> +       case 1:                                         \
>>> +       case 2:                                         \
>>> +       case 4:                                         \
>>> +               *(ptr) = (__pu_val);                    \
>>> +               break;                                  \
>>> +       case 8:                                         \
>>> +               memcpy(ptr, &__pu_val, sizeof (*(ptr)));\
>>
>> potential cast problem
> 
> Yes, I'm looking into this already, probably will do something
> based on the s390 code, which seems to do this correctly.
> 
>>> +#define put_user(x, ptr) (                             \
>>> +       access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, ptr, sizeof (*ptr)) ?   \
>>> +               __put_user(x, ptr) :                    \
>>> +               -EFAULT)
>>
>> IMHO write it as inline function with type checking.
> 
> Unfortunately, this doesn't work because of the callin
> conventions: __put_user needs to know the type of ptr,
> so it has to be a macro.

yes, I am looking on it too.

Michal

> 
> 	Arnd <><


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/