[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090501144857.GA25398@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:48:58 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....EDU>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....EDU>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] section name cleanup for mn10300
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:35:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU> wrote:
>
> > This patch series cleans up the section names on the mn10300
> > architecture. It requires the architecture-independent macro
> > definitions from this patch series:
>
> Interesting... Whilst it compiles and links with no problems, this cleanup
> has the following detrimental effects:
>
> None of these patches applied
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1879329 82980 321772 2284081 22da31 vmlinux
>
> All of these patches applied:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1879329 87076 321772 2288177 22ea31 vmlinux
>
> Somewhere it eats an extra page.
This is likely due to moving around the sections and
we have got them in less perfect order.
I also thing 5/6 is wrong as it moves
init_task befoe _edata.
Could you try to back out them one by one
to see which one causes the extra memory waste.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists