[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090501145528.GA7618@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:28 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
wcohen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add tracepoints docbook (take #2)
* Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:29:08PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>
> > The following patches add a new tracepoint docbook. Since
> > tracepoints can be defined by various macros and in various
> > files, I think it important to clearly document the available
> > tracepoints, as Andrew has pointed out. This helps us see what
> > we have and what we don't have. If this patch is accepted, I
> > hope that others will add docbook style comments, so we can have
> > a complete accounting of the kernel's tracepoints.
> >
>
> hi,
>
> i'd also like to get some agreement that future tracepoints need
> to have this sort of documentation included when they are
> submitted. Also, I'd like people who have already submitted
> tracepoints to go back and add this kind of documentation. I'll
> volunteer to police the effort if we agree it should be done.
sure - but sending patches would be even more useful than policing
:)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists