lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 1 May 2009 17:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's in hid.git for 2.6.30

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> > > > +       if (!(hid->claimed & HID_CLAIMED_INPUT))
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > is there a guarantee all keyboards will be claimed as input devices?
> > do you see any way how hid->inputs could currently be initialized other
> > than the device being claimed by hid-input?
> No, but I am worried about a false return of 0 here, not the other way
> round. This method is necessary because keyboards don't wake up
> if a key is released. Suspending a keyboard with a key pressed will lead
> to an endless repetition of that key.
> So I wonder whether it is possible to have a keyboard not claimed as an
> input device.

If driven by usbhid, the only way how keyboard could be handled if not 
claimed by hid-input is a userspace hiddev or hidraw driver. And we don't 
suspend if hidraw/hiddev node is open, right?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ