[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49FB23E4.2030900@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:31:32 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....EDU>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....EDU>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] section name cleanup for x86
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU> wrote:
>>
>>> This patch series cleans up the section names on the x86
>>> architecture. It requires the architecture-independent macro
>>> definitions from this patch series:
>>>
>>> <http://www.spinics.net/lists/mips/msg33499.html>
>> Hm, we cannot pick the x86 bits up into the x86 tree without having
>> these macros upstream first. So those macros need acks from Sam and
>> maybe Linus will take them out of order. (they are pure additions so
>> they look fairly safe and uncontroversial)
>
> Thats the plan.
>
By the way, I personally like the overall approach; I haven't studied
the patchset in detail yet, though.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists