[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090501203639.GA9396@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 22:36:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
ReiserFS Development List <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements,
faster than Bkl based scheme
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> The BKL is clearly removed at a faster reate with such debugging
> measures in place. With such measures the BKL _really_ hurts, and
> very visibly so - and that results in active removal.
Btw., if you can think of any way to create a cleaner debug tool
here i'd be glad to start a new tree that adds only _that_ tool -
and that could perhaps be dealt with independently and possibly
pulled upstream too, if clean enough.
The problem is, i think it would still quack like a global mutex,
would walk like a global mutex and would look like a global mutex
:-/
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists