[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090430171417.b7adab90.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:14:17 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: rdunlap@...otime.net, fenghua.yu@...el.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
weidong.han@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IOMMU Pass Through Support
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:05:10 -0700
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> > > : --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > > : +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > > : @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ again:
> > > : return page_address(page);
> > > : }
> > > :
> > > : +extern int iommu_pass_through;
> > > : +
> > >
> > > Which is wrong and unnecessary - the variable was already declared in a
> > > header file.
> > >
> > > scripts/checkpatch.pl would have warned you about this error, but
> > > apparently neither you nor the people who reviewed or merged the patch
> > > bother to use it.
>
> Actually checkpatch.pl doesn't report anything wrong with this statement.
Running 4ed0d3e6c64cfd9ba4ceb2099b10d1cf8ece4320 through checkpatch produces
the below output:
WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files
#83: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:163:
+extern int iommu_pass_through;
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 15)
#108: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:74:
+ if ((!iommu_detected && !no_iommu && max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN) ||
[...]
swiotlb = 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists