[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090430181340.6f07421d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:13:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: elladan@...imo.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: evict use-once pages first (v2)
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:59:36 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:45:36 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Were you able to tell whether altering /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
> > appropriately regulated the rate at which the mapped page count
> > decreased?
>
> That should not make a difference at all for mapped file
> pages, after the change was merged that makes the VM ignores
> the referenced bit of mapped active file pages.
>
> Ever since the split LRU code was merged, all that the
> swappiness controls is the aggressiveness of file vs
> anonymous LRU scanning.
Which would cause exactly the problem Elladan saw?
> Currently the kernel has no effective code to protect the
> page cache working set from streaming IO. Elladan's bug
> report shows that we do need some kind of protection...
Seems to me that reclaim should treat swapcache-backed mapped mages in
a similar fashion to file-backed mapped pages?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists