[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49FC56EE.4080402@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 10:21:34 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"lee.schermerhorn@...com" <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] vmscan: don't export nr_saved_scan in /proc/zoneinfo
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> The lru->nr_saved_scan's are not meaningful counters for even kernel
> developers. They typically are smaller than 32 and are always 0 for
> large lists. So remove them from /proc/zoneinfo.
>
> Hopefully this interface change won't break too many scripts.
> /proc/zoneinfo is too unstructured to be script friendly, and I wonder
> the affected scripts - if there are any - are still bleeding since the
> not long ago commit "vmscan: split LRU lists into anon & file sets",
> which also touched the "scanned" line :)
>
> If we are to re-export accumulated vmscan counts in the future, they
> can go to new lines in /proc/zoneinfo instead of the current form, or
> to /sys/devices/system/node/node0/meminfo?
>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists