[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090502155514.GA18847@Krystal>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:55:14 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.langsdorf@....com,
arekm@...en.pl, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86 amd fix cmpxchg read acquire barrier
* Pavel Machek (pavel@....cz) wrote:
> On Wed 2009-04-22 16:18:54, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > http://google-perftools.googlecode.com/svn-history/r48/trunk/src/base/atomicops-internals-x86.cc
> >
> > says
> >
> > " // Opteron Rev E has a bug in which on very rare occasions a locked
> > // instruction doesn't act as a read-acquire barrier if followed by a
> > // non-locked read-modify-write instruction. Rev F has this bug in
> > // pre-release versions, but not in versions released to customers,
> > // so we test only for Rev E, which is family 15, model 32..63 inclusive.
>
> Could we be more careful here and catch the F pre-release versions,
> too? Stepping should help there...
>
Yes, I guess for F pre-releases we're stucked unless AMD provides more
information. Dtrace did not seem to bother about F pre-release versions
though, neither did Google.
Mathieu
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists