[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090502013906.GA5331@nowhere>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 03:39:07 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
ReiserFS Development List <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements,
faster than Bkl based scheme
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:44:16AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This reiserfs patchset applies against latest tip:core/kill-the-BKL
> It adds various explicit write lock releases on specific sleeping sections.
>
> A performance test with dbench on UP with 100 processus during 100 seconds
> gives the following results:
>
> Locking Throughput
>
> Bkl: 11.2587 MB/s
> Write lock/Mutex: 12.5713 MB/s
I just tested on SMP with two CPU:
Write Lock/Mutex: Throughput 66.9269 MB/sec 100 procs
Bkl: Throughput 71.9998 MB/sec 100 procs
So:
UP: 11% faster
SMP: 8% slower
I guess there is still some work to do :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists