linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (devtmpfs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090502070144.GA19849@infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 2 May 2009 03:01:44 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (devtmpfs)

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:56:16PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> As we discussed on irc, I think you no longer object to this, and see
> how it solves a real problem, and can probably help out your initramfs
> tools.

I defintively objet to the implementation, I'm in the process of writing
up the objections.  I must say I'm generally disappointed how fast
controversial stuff ends up in linux-next.  At least your tree
traditionally was quilt series so it can be dropped, unlike some other
people sucking stuff into gigantic git trees that never get rebased :P

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/