[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905021519040.9563@pc-004.diku.dk>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:19:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: hverkuil@...all.nl, ivtv-devel@...vdriver.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ivtv-ioctl.c: possible problem with IVTV_F_I_DMA
The file drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-ioctl.c contains the following code:
(starting at line 183 in a recent linux-next)
while (itv->i_flags & IVTV_F_I_DMA) {
got_sig = signal_pending(current);
if (got_sig)
break;
got_sig = 0;
schedule();
}
The only possible value of IVTV_F_I_DMA, however, seems to be 0, as defined
in drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-driver.h, and thus the test is never true.
Is this what is intended, or should the test be expressed in another way?
julia
This problem was found using the following semantic match:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
@r expression@
identifier C;
expression E;
position p;
@@
(
E & C@p && ...
|
E & C@p || ...
)
@s@
identifier r.C;
position p1;
@@
#define C 0
@t@
identifier r.C;
expression E != 0;
@@
#define C E
@script:python depends on s && !t@
p << r.p;
C << r.C;
@@
cocci.print_main("and with 0", p)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists