linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49FCF423.7040609@kernel.org>
Date:	Sun, 03 May 2009 10:32:19 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	bzolnier@...il.com, petkovbb@...glemail.com,
	sshtylyov@...mvista.com, mike.miller@...com,
	chirag.kantharia@...com, Eric.Moore@....com,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
	zaitcev@...hat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	paul.clements@...eleye.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
	tim@...erelk.net, jeremy@...source.com, adrian@...en.demon.co.uk,
	oakad@...oo.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	ballabio_dario@....com, davem@...emloft.net, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 16:47 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> @@ -966,7 +965,7 @@ static int scsi_init_sgtable(struct request
>> *req, struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb,
>>>       BUG_ON(count > sdb->table.nents);
>>>       sdb->table.nents = count;
>>>       if (blk_pc_request(req))
>>> -             sdb->length = req->data_len;
>>> +             sdb->length = blk_rq_bytes(req);
>>>       else
>>>               sdb->length = blk_rq_sectors(req) << 9;
>> Is this true. I thought they must be the same now. I was actually
>> anticipating this if() removed.
> 
> Me too ... there's one of these in scsi_lib.c as well.

Not until the next patch.  It's probably safe for scsi to make the
switch here but I wanted to do the transition in two logical steps -
1. make all users use accessors in the defined manner without
affecting anything else 2. knowing #1 is true for all low level
drivers, unify implementation inside block layer.  I had a following
patch which tried to do sweep conversion of all llds (which is
guaranteed to be safe after #2 has happened) but it looked like more
trouble than worth and seems like best left to each subsystem, so
please go ahead and clean up subsystems on top of this patchset.  :-)

> The difference comes because filesystem requests are always in sectors,
> but BLOCK_PC requests are always in bytes .... we should be able to wrap
> the accessors so they do the correct conversions.

After this series is applied, blk_rq_bytes() >> 9 == blk_rq_sectors()
is guaranteed (note that blk_rq_sectors() << 9 might not equal
blk_rq_bytes() if the data transfer length isn't multiple of 512), so
the above if can be removed.  I just didn't want to make the
conversion (probably safe for scsi) before the actual unification.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/