[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090503203111.GB8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 21:31:11 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v3 2/2] kvm: add support for irqfd via
eventfd-notification interface
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > IOW, the sane solution would be to export something that returns your
> > struct file *. And stop playing with fd completely.
>
> This builds but it's not tested at all.
>
> - Make all the work of the old anon_inode_getfd(), done by a new
> anon_inode_getfile(), with anon_inode_getfd() using its services
>
> - Make all the work done by sys_eventfd(), done by a new
> eventfd_file_create() (which in turn uses anon_inode_getfile()), with
> sys_eventfd() using its services
>
> IRQfd can use eventfd_file_create(), fget(), get_unused_fd_flags() and
> fd_install() just before returning.
> Is that what you had in mind?
More or less, but I'd like to see the irqfd side of that...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists