[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090503211118.GA22973@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:11:18 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu_sched_grace_period: kill the bogus flush_signals()
As a kernel thread, rcu_sched_grace_period() runs with all signals ignored.
It can never receive a signal even if it sleeps in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, it
needs the explicit allow_signal() to be visible for signals.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--- PTRACE/kernel/rcupreempt.c~ 2009-04-09 00:39:10.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/kernel/rcupreempt.c 2009-05-03 02:17:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -1356,17 +1356,11 @@ static int rcu_sched_grace_period(void *
rcu_ctrlblk.sched_sleep = rcu_sched_sleeping;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcu_ctrlblk.schedlock, flags);
- ret = 0;
+ ret = 0; /* unused */
__wait_event_interruptible(rcu_ctrlblk.sched_wq,
rcu_ctrlblk.sched_sleep != rcu_sched_sleeping,
ret);
- /*
- * Signals would prevent us from sleeping, and we cannot
- * do much with them in any case. So flush them.
- */
- if (ret)
- flush_signals(current);
couldsleepnext = 0;
} while (!kthread_should_stop());
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists