[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090503225616.GD8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:56:16 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: tridge@...ba.org
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ogawa Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:25:05AM +1000, tridge@...ba.org wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> > Well if they are obvious, please get us someone who _can_ discuss them
> > with us. Preferably a lawyer that can explain why the patch is
> > neccessary.
>
> I am trying to get that to happen, and I do realise that getting a
> lawyer to publicly explain the situation would be really
> worthwhile. Unfortunately lawyers are (mostly) very shy of making
> public statements of this type, because the legal consequences of
> making these statements can be non-trivial.
Practical consequences of establishing that kind of precedent (applying
a patch on the grounds of nothing but vague references to possibly
legal problems, with author explicitly refusing to explain exact reasons)
can also be non-trivial... And I'm not sure that it won't have legal
ones as well, while we are at it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists