linux-kernel - Re: No NCQ support on X61s Ultrabay? (Intel ICH8 SATA controller question)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874ow1ak76.fsf@sparse.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sun, 03 May 2009 18:35:41 -0400
From:	Jason Riedy <jason@....org>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No NCQ support on X61s Ultrabay?  (Intel ICH8 SATA controller question)

And Robert Hancock writes:
> Well, it's a potential concern, but it's simple enough I doubt it
> would really result in much of a burden.

My D620 is one of those that corrupted the file system with the
force-AHCI patch.  If I hadn't applied the patch externally, I might
have guessed it was the file system code...  Given all the churn in the
fs code right now, is it wise to add another *known* corruption vector?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/