lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 3 May 2009 11:43:45 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
	"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: evict use-once pages first (v2)

On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 11:24:03AM +0800, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009 11:15:39 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > Commit 7e9cd484204f(vmscan: fix pagecache reclaim referenced bit
> > check) tries to address scalability problem when every page get
> > mapped and referenced, so that logic(which lowed the priority of
> > mapped pages) could be enabled only on conditions like (priority <
> > DEF_PRIORITY).
> > 
> > Or preferably we can explicitly protect the mapped executables,
> > as illustrated by this patch (a quick prototype).
> 
> Over time, given enough streaming IO and idle applications,
> executables will still be evicted with just this patch.
> 
> However, a combination of your patch and mine might do the
> trick.  I suspect that executables are never a very big
> part of memory, except on small memory systems, so protecting
> just the mapped executables should not be a scalability
> problem.

Yes, that's my intent to take advantage of you patch :-)

There may be programs that embed large amount of static data with
them - think about self-decompression data - but that's fine: this
patch behaves not in a too persistent way. Plus we can apply a size
limit(say 100M) if necessary.

> My patch in combination with your patch should make sure
> that if something gets evicted from the active list, it's
> not executables - meanwhile, lots of the time streaming
> IO will completely leave the active file list alone.
 
They together make
- mapped executable pages the first class citizen;
- streaming IO least intrusive.

I think that would make most desktop users and server administrators
contented and comfortable :-)

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ