[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905030203520.16287@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 02:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: uv - prevent NULL dereference in
uv_system_init
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Hm, would be nice if we had a __GFP_PANIC variant in kmalloc that
> would just panic straight in the allocator, when allocation failure
> is not acceptable. (Andrew Cc:-ed)
>
> It does not increase the priority of the allocation nor does it
> trigger any 'dont fail' logic - it is simply the central expression
> of 'this should not have failed, panic'.
>
SLUB stores two new slab allocation orders: the cache's adjustable order
which is calculated at kmem_cache_create(), and the smallest order that
can accommodate at least one object allocation. The latter is used as a
fallback when the former fails in the page allocator.
So for __GFP_PANIC to work in this case, it could not be implemented in
the page allocator (SLUB also passes __GFP_NORETRY for new slabs) but
rather above it in allocate_slab(). It would then be a no-op for
alloc_pages().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists