[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090503094718.GB10278@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:47:18 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Disable OOM killer during system-wide power
transitions
> > Does the same apply to suspending? If so, why?
>
> Because I think it doesn't work anyway. User space processes are frozen and
> effectively in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, so they won't be killed.
>
> > I think this is an OK change, as long as the only thing which is
> > allocating memory is hibernation itself. If random processes are still
> > doing random memory allocations at this time then their failed memory
> > allocation could be just as fatal as an oom-killing. Moreso if they're
> > s/bin/init or whatever.
>
> At this point all of the user space tasks are frozen.
Well, many kernel threads still remain active. But it is true that OOM
killer is unlikely to help.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists