[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1241433188.21088.22.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 13:33:08 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: introducing __GFP_PANIC
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:11 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> I believe this version should be correct (still RFC).
> __GFP_NOWARN has printk limit so instead of making
> additional checks (while combining those prink in
> original code) just adding panic with order and flags
> should be cleaner (as it done at moment :)
Looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
I suspect the patch needs some additional work for -mm due to Mel
Gorman's page allocator cleanup and optimization patches.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists