[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49FEDAC0.3040503@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 16:08:32 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, bzolnier@...il.com,
petkovbb@...glemail.com, mike.miller@...com, Eric.Moore@....com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
zaitcev@...hat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
paul.clements@...eleye.com, tim@...erelk.net, jeremy@...source.com,
adrian@...en.demon.co.uk, oakad@...oo.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, ballabio_dario@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com, bharrosh@...asas.com,
Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] block: add rq->resid_len
Hello.
Tejun Heo wrote:
> rq->data_len served two purposes - the length of data buffer on issue
> and the residual count on completion. This duality creates some
> headaches.
> First of all, block layer and low level drivers can't really determine
> what rq->data_len contains while a request is executing. It could be
> the total request length or it coulde be anything else one of the
> lower layers is using to keep track of residual count. This
> complicates things because blk_rq_bytes() and thus
> [__]blk_end_request_all() relies on rq->data_len for PC commands.
> Drivers which want to report residual count should first cache the
> total request length, update rq->data_len and then complete the
> request with the cached data length.
> Secondly, it makes requests default to reporting full residual count,
> ie. reporting that no data transfer occurred. The residual count is
> an exception not the norm; however, the driver should clear
> rq->data_len to zero to signify the normal cases while leaving it
> alone means no data transfer occurred at all. This reverse default
> behavior complicates code unnecessarily and renders block PC on some
> drivers (ide-tape/floppy) unuseable.
> This patch adds rq->resid_len which is used only for residual count.
> While at it, remove now unnecessasry blk_rq_bytes() caching in
> ide_pc_intr() as rq->data_len is not changed anymore.
> Boaz: spotted missing conversion in osd.
> [ Impact: cleanup residual count handling, report 0 resid by default ]
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> index 7149224..3813a0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int ide_tape_callback(ide_drive_t *drive, int dsc)
> }
>
> tape->first_frame += blocks;
> - rq->data_len -= blocks * tape->blk_size;
> + rq->resid_len = blk_rq_bytes(rq) - blocks * tape->blk_size;
Is it already guaranteed that rq->data_len == blk_rq_bytes(rq) here?
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists