linux-kernel - [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: fixup nmi_watchdog vs perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 May 2009 17:06:30 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: fixup nmi_watchdog vs perf_counter boo-boo

Commit-ID:  dea47c786c4a4198f4d6e6ba860ce59729c45481
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/dea47c786c4a4198f4d6e6ba860ce59729c45481
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:47:44 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:04:46 +0200

perf_counter: x86: fixup nmi_watchdog vs perf_counter boo-boo

Invert the atomic_inc_not_zero() test so that we will indeed detect the
first activation.

Also rename the global num_counters, since its easy to confuse with
x86_pmu.num_counters.

[ Impact: fix non-working perfcounters on AMD CPUs, cleanup ]

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1241455664.7620.4938.camel@...ns>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index d4c0cc9..196b58f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ again:
 	return new_raw_count;
 }
 
-static atomic_t num_counters;
+static atomic_t active_counters;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmc_reserve_mutex);
 
 static bool reserve_pmc_hardware(void)
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void release_pmc_hardware(void)
 
 static void hw_perf_counter_destroy(struct perf_counter *counter)
 {
-	if (atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(&num_counters, &pmc_reserve_mutex)) {
+	if (atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(&active_counters, &pmc_reserve_mutex)) {
 		release_pmc_hardware();
 		mutex_unlock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
 	}
@@ -248,12 +248,12 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	err = 0;
-	if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&num_counters)) {
+	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&active_counters)) {
 		mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
-		if (atomic_read(&num_counters) == 0 && !reserve_pmc_hardware())
+		if (atomic_read(&active_counters) == 0 && !reserve_pmc_hardware())
 			err = -EBUSY;
 		else
-			atomic_inc(&num_counters);
+			atomic_inc(&active_counters);
 		mutex_unlock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
 	}
 	if (err)
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
 	if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && hw_event->nmi)
 		hwc->nmi = 1;
 
-	hwc->irq_period		= hw_event->irq_period;
+	hwc->irq_period	= hw_event->irq_period;
 	if ((s64)hwc->irq_period <= 0 || hwc->irq_period > x86_pmu.max_period)
 		hwc->irq_period = x86_pmu.max_period;
 
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
 	struct pt_regs *regs;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!atomic_read(&num_counters))
+	if (!atomic_read(&active_counters))
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	switch (cmd) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/