lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 May 2009 07:39:06 +0200
From:	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
To:	Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>
Cc:	Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
	Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@...e.de>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] Generic LRU cache built on a kmem_cache and a "struct
	shrinker"

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:20:02AM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com> wrote:
> >> but wait for the next post to see a better documented (or possibly
> >> rewritten) implementation of this.
> >
> > Yeah, I'm definitely reworking it now that I have a better
> > understanding of what the DRBD code really wants.  My main intention
> > is to have the code be flexible enough that filesystems and other
> > sorts of network-related code can use it transparently, without
> > requiring much in the way of manual tuning.  See Linus' various
> > comments on why he *hates* manual tunables.

:)

> I'm heading to bed, but I figured I'd share what I've hacked up so
> far.  This new version hasn't even been remotely compile-tested yet,
> but it has most of the runtime-adjustable limits and tunables added.

> Lars, hopefully this is a little bit more usable for you?

I had my (as usual too short) sleep already,
and now it looks much closer to what we need,
partly because you changed them (thanks), and partly because
my focus area on the display now is slighly larger again ;)

hash table for the "get_by_label" still missing, I'll see
what I can do about that.

	Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ