[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090504175414.GC8822@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:54:14 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, tridge@...ba.org,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Ogawa Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:49:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Ah, but you are not simply asking us to -do- our homework, but also to
> make that homework public on LKML. Please note that Matthew's earlier
> email indicates that he does not expect to be able to convince his
> employer to make such homework public.
I have no data upon which to make a judgement as to the probability
of my lawyer doing anything. The implication I took away from your
words earlier in this thread is that _no_ lawyer is going to permit
this homework to be published. Maybe Intel's lawyers differ with IBM's
lawyers on this point. I wouldn't know.
But all you're hearing from me is an echo of your own assertions, not
a concurrence.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists