[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090504125124.0f469970@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:51:24 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jake Edge <jake@....net>, security@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [Security] [PATCH] proc: avoid information leaks to
non-privileged processes
On Mon, 4 May 2009 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Jake Edge wrote:
> >
> > This is essentially v2 of "[PATCH] proc: avoid leaking eip, esp, or
> > wchan to non-privileged processes", adding some of Eric Biederman's
> > suggestions as well as the start_stack change (only give out that
> > address if the process is ptrace()-able). This has been tested
> > with ps and top without any ill effects being seen.
>
> Looks sane to me. Anybody objects?
>
Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists