linux-kernel - Re: CFS not suitable for desktop computers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49FF57AC.7070104@nortel.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 May 2009 15:01:32 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Nico Schümann <spam@...o22.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: CFS not suitable for desktop computers

Nico Schümann wrote:
> Thank you Ray Lee and Mike Galbraith for your responses, I ran the 
> script and attached its gathered information.
> 
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> How hard is hard?  Can you describe the loads you're having trouble
>> with, and the hardware you're running them on?
>>
>>   
> I could reproduce "hard" load by just compiling the linux kernel, make 
> -j3 while reading mails with Thunderbird, which is not that hard 
> foreground load. Thunderbird starts reacting really slowly while compiling.

I wonder if this could be related to I/O rather than the task scheduler 
proper.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/