[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090504095300.GF23223@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:53:00 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Elad Lahav <elahav@...terloo.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implementation of the sendgroup() system call
> >My guess it's more the copies than the calls? It sounds like
> >you want sendfile() for UDP. I think that would be a cleaner solution
> >than such a specific hack for your application. It would
> >have the advantage of saving the first copy too and be
> >truly zero copy on capable NICs.
> >
>
> An aio udp send could accomplish both multiple packets per call, and
AIO sockets are a lot of work. There have been various attempts
over the years, but they are very difficult. This was mostly
for TCP -- possibly UDP would be a bit easier -- but still
many complications. It would also need a lot of changes and
you would need to convince the network maintainers that they
are a good idea.
> >Or perhaps simple send to a local multicast group and let
> >some netfilter module turn that into regular UDP.
> >
>
> Sounds hacky and rooty.
rooty? Everyone can send to all directions anyways.
It wouldn't be perfect, but quite usable as a short term solution
for a production server.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists