[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 12:42:16 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
CC: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, bzolnier@...il.com,
petkovbb@...glemail.com, mike.miller@...com, Eric.Moore@....com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
zaitcev@...hat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
paul.clements@...eleye.com, tim@...erelk.net, jeremy@...source.com,
adrian@...en.demon.co.uk, oakad@...oo.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, ballabio_dario@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com, bharrosh@...asas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and
convert obvious ones
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Implement accessors - blk_rq_pos(), blk_rq_sectors() and
>> blk_rq_cur_sectors() which return rq->sector, rq->hard_nr_sectors and
>
> Well, blk_rq_pos() returns rq->hard_sector, not rq->sector, doesn't it?
Right, description updated.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists