[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090505235736.GA7526@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:57:36 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: chrisw@...s-sol.org, roland@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ptrace: ptrace_attach: check PF_KTHREAD +
exit_state instead of ->mm
On 05/05, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2009 00:47:22 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > - Add PF_KTHREAD check to prevent attaching to the kernel thread
> > with a borrowed ->mm.
> >
> > With or without this change we can race with daemonize() which
> > can set PF_KTHREAD or clear ->mm after ptrace_attach() does the
> > check, but this doesn't matter because reparent_to_kthreadd()
> > does ptrace_unlink().
> >
> > - Kill "!task->mm" check. We don't really care about ->mm != NULL,
> > and the task can call exit_mm() right after we drop task_lock().
> > What we need is to make sure we can't attach after exit_notify(),
> > check task->exit_state != 0 instead.
> >
>
> These patches make a mess of utrace-core.patch. Do we really want to do that?
Aaaah. Sorry! forgot to clearify...
These patches depend on
utrace-core-kill-exclude_xtrace-logic.patch
which hopefully can be folded into utrace-core.patch. In that case these
changes do not depend on utrace, and they can go ahead of utrace.
Is this acceptable for you ?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists