[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090506081221.GA15317@damson.getinternet.no>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:12:21 +0200
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: printk %0*X is broken.
2009/5/6 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
>
> Cc:-ed more folks who modified lib/vsprintf.c recently.
>
> Ingo
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> it seems someone broke
>>
>> printk( "%0*X\n", width, x);
>>
>> looks like 0 is dumped.
After %, we look for flags. The problem is that when a flag is found, we
don't advance in the format string. And thus we start looking for the
precision, which is read as 0, because we are still at the 0. I think
this patch should fix it.
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 7536ace..ae7d4b2 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -800,14 +800,15 @@ static int format_decode(const char *fmt, struct printf_spec *spec)
if (fmt != start || !*fmt)
return fmt - start;
+ /* this skips the first '%' */
+ ++fmt;
+
/* Process flags */
spec->flags = 0;
- while (1) { /* this also skips first '%' */
+ while (1) {
bool found = true;
- ++fmt;
-
switch (*fmt) {
case '-': spec->flags |= LEFT; break;
case '+': spec->flags |= PLUS; break;
@@ -819,6 +820,8 @@ static int format_decode(const char *fmt, struct printf_spec *spec)
if (!found)
break;
+
+ ++fmt;
}
/* get field width */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists