[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A016B98.7070701@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 13:51:04 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] deal with interrupt shadow state for emulated instruction
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:40:11PM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 8e680c3..a49d07b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -510,6 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>> void (*run)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>> int (*handle_exit)(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void (*skip_emulated_instruction)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> + void (*set_interrupt_shadow)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int mask);
>>
> There is .drop_interrupt_shadow() callback. The patch should remove it and
> replace its use by set_interrupt_shadow().
>
That would be [PATCH 1/2].
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists