[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090506110258.GA24850@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:58 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org,
srostedt@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] sputrace: use the generic event tracer
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:57:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Nice! Needs also an Ack from PowerPC folks before we can do this.
> The cross section to other powerpc code seems to be rather low.
cbe-oss-dev is the Cell list.
> > -config SPU_TRACE
> > - tristate "SPU event tracing support"
> > - depends on SPU_FS && MARKERS
> > - help
> > - This option allows reading a trace of spu-related events through
> > - the sputrace file in procfs.
>
> I think we should keep this option around.
Why? trace_events that aren't enabled are extremly low overhead.
And most in the current tree are non-optional.
> > +# magic for the trace events
> > +CFLAGS_sched.o := -I$(src)
>
> Steve, i'm wondering whether this type of Makefile hackery (caused
> by modular tracepoints) could be eliminated ...
We would just have to include the header file with "" instead of <>.
But I remember Steve not liking this when we talked about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists