[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090506110258.GA24850@lst.de>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:58 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org,
	srostedt@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] sputrace: use the generic event tracer
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:57:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Nice! Needs also an Ack from PowerPC folks before we can do this. 
> The cross section to other powerpc code seems to be rather low.
cbe-oss-dev is the Cell list.
> > -config SPU_TRACE
> > -	tristate "SPU event tracing support"
> > -	depends on SPU_FS && MARKERS
> > -	help
> > -	  This option allows reading a trace of spu-related events through
> > -	  the sputrace file in procfs.
> 
> I think we should keep this option around.
Why?  trace_events that aren't enabled are extremly low overhead.
And most in the current tree are non-optional.
> > +# magic for the trace events
> > +CFLAGS_sched.o := -I$(src)
> 
> Steve, i'm wondering whether this type of Makefile hackery (caused 
> by modular tracepoints) could be eliminated ...
We would just have to include the header file with "" instead of <>.
But I remember Steve not liking this when we talked about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
