| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905061537070.24643@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ring-buffer: add benchmark and tester
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> >
> > This patch adds code that can benchmark the ring buffer as well as
> > test it. This code can be compiled into the kernel (not
> > recommended) or as a module.
>
> > [ Impact: see how changes to the ring buffer affect stability and performance ]
>
> This triggered this lockdep assert:
>
> [ 43.242660] eth1: link down
> [ 43.244570] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
> [ 43.339828] eth0: no link during initialization.
> [ 43.344562] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> [ 44.036177] Starting ring buffer hammer
> [ 45.856513]
> [ 45.856513] =================================
> [ 45.862366] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [ 45.866737] 2.6.30-rc4-tip-01596-g844be76-dirty #38989
> [ 45.871872] ---------------------------------
> [ 45.876234] inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
> [ 45.882247] rb_consumer/519 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
> [ 45.887750] (net/core/link_watch.c:36){?.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8044fb31>] del_timer_sync+0x0/0x88
> [ 45.896691] {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
> [ 45.901572] [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> [ 45.906673] irq event stamp: 26933632
> [ 45.910330] hardirqs last enabled at (26933631): [<ffffffff80df7691>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4c
> [ 45.919827] hardirqs last disabled at (26933632): [<ffffffff8040b0b7>] save_args+0x67/0x70
> [ 45.928141] softirqs last enabled at (26924896): [<ffffffff8044b9c3>] __do_softirq+0x17d/0x189
> [ 45.936898] softirqs last disabled at (26924889): [<ffffffff8040c47c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> [ 45.945459]
> [ 45.945459] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 45.952008] 1 lock held by rb_consumer/519:
> [ 45.956193] #0: (&np->lock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffff809a07c4>] nv_nic_irq_optimized+0x192/0x28b
> [ 45.965062]
> [ 45.965062] stack backtrace:
> [ 45.969427] Pid: 519, comm: rb_consumer Not tainted 2.6.30-rc4-tip-01596-g844be76-dirty #38989
> [ 45.978057] Call Trace:
> [ 45.980512] <IRQ> [<ffffffff80467583>] print_usage_bug+0x156/0x167
> [ 45.986885] [<ffffffff804675d9>] valid_state+0x45/0x52
> [ 45.992138] [<ffffffff80467f23>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0x55
> [ 45.998249] [<ffffffff8046762f>] mark_lock_irq+0x49/0xee
> [ 46.003652] [<ffffffff804677a7>] mark_lock+0xd3/0x139
> [ 46.008803] [<ffffffff80467861>] mark_irqflags+0x54/0x125
> [ 46.014303] [<ffffffff80468e26>] __lock_acquire+0x187/0x2fe
> [ 46.019961] [<ffffffff8046905e>] lock_acquire+0xc1/0xe5
> [ 46.025278] [<ffffffff8044fb31>] ? del_timer_sync+0x0/0x88
> [ 46.030864] [<ffffffff8044fb72>] del_timer_sync+0x41/0x88
> [ 46.036346] [<ffffffff8044fb31>] ? del_timer_sync+0x0/0x88
> [ 46.041949] [<ffffffff80c0ea2e>] linkwatch_schedule_work+0x82/0xa0
> [ 46.048207] [<ffffffff80c0eafa>] linkwatch_fire_event+0xae/0xb3
> [ 46.054213] [<ffffffff80c24211>] netif_carrier_on+0x2e/0x40
> [ 46.059868] [<ffffffff8099fa63>] nv_linkchange+0x2a/0x6f
> [ 46.065276] [<ffffffff8099fad1>] nv_link_irq+0x29/0x2b
> [ 46.070508] [<ffffffff809a07cc>] nv_nic_irq_optimized+0x19a/0x28b
> [ 46.076690] [<ffffffff804807be>] handle_IRQ_event+0x59/0x132
> [ 46.082436] [<ffffffff804824a8>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x90/0xd0
> [ 46.088296] [<ffffffff8040df2a>] handle_irq+0x24/0x2e
> [ 46.093436] [<ffffffff8040d661>] do_IRQ+0x5f/0xbf
> [ 46.098228] [<ffffffff8040bc93>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
> [ 46.103468] <EOI> [<ffffffff804890ac>] ? ring_buffer_consume+0x6d/0xc3
> [ 46.110196] [<ffffffff80df7694>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x4c
> [ 46.116621] [<ffffffff804890db>] ? ring_buffer_consume+0x9c/0xc3
> [ 46.122728] [<ffffffff8048ab18>] ? ring_buffer_consumer+0x52/0x161
> [ 46.129003] [<ffffffff8048ac27>] ? ring_buffer_consumer_thread+0x0/0x8d
> [ 46.135707] [<ffffffff8048ac48>] ? ring_buffer_consumer_thread+0x21/0x8d
> [ 46.142489] [<ffffffff80459ee4>] ? kthread+0x5b/0x88
> [ 46.147550] [<ffffffff8040c37a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [ 46.152703] [<ffffffff8043fb2f>] ? finish_task_switch+0x40/0xf4
> [ 46.158698] [<ffffffff8040bd3c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [ 46.164095] [<ffffffff80459e89>] ? kthread+0x0/0x88
> [ 46.169066] [<ffffffff8040c370>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> [ 46.174218] eth0: link up.
> [ 53.664036] End ring buffer hammer
> [ 53.701419] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [ 53.712283] Mapped at:
> [ 53.714462] [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> [ 53.725779] IPv4 FIB: Using LC-trie version 0.408
This could possibly be a bug someplace else. I've booted my box with
this config and have yet to trigger it. Perhaps it is a problem with a
driver?
The test creates two threads. They run in a loop (with interrupts and
preemption enabled) for 10 seconds, then they sleep for 10 seconds. I see
in your config that you have PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY set. This means that when
they run, nothing will stop them from running for those 10 second. This
will change the way things work, and if something has some dependency on
timings, it may break it.
I can add a cond_resched to the loop?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists