[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090506204156.GB31071@waste.org>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:41:57 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Jake Edge <jake@....net>, security@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] random: make get_random_int() more random
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:09:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I then ran the FIPS randomness test over the first 20,000 bits [2.5K
> data], which it passed:
That's proves nothing except that you have no idea what you're talking
about. People regularly break things that FIPS gives flying colors.
FIPS is nothing but a statistical sanity-check.
Do you need this to be publicly broken again by someone who actually knows
something about cryptanalysis before you'll accept that it's a bad
idea? If so, then please move the code out of random.c, so that I
don't have to share in your embarassment a second time.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists