[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A022333.8030200@am.sony.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:54:27 -0700
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: How to use a different sched_clock() for ftrace on omap?
Hi all,
I've worked up a replacement sched_clock for ftrace on my omap platform.
The current sched_clock, based on the 32K timer, has low resolution and
doesn't provide very useful results.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure the best way to use my special one, in place
of a common one in arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
Here's a patch:
---
arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c
@@ -212,6 +212,15 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_mp
.flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS,
};
+unsigned long long notrace sched_clock(void)
+{
+ unsigned long long ret;
+
+ ret = (unsigned long long) ~omap_mpu_timer_read(1);
+ ret = (ret * clocksource_mpu.mult_orig) >>clocksource_mpu.shift;
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void __init omap_init_clocksource(unsigned long rate)
{
static char err[] __initdata = KERN_ERR
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_32
* Returns current time from boot in nsecs. It's OK for this to wrap
* around for now, as it's just a relative time stamp.
*/
-unsigned long long notrace sched_clock(void)
+__attribute__((weak)) unsigned long long notrace sched_clock_old(void)
{
unsigned long long ret;
Obviously, renaming the common sched_clock() to sched_clock_old() is
a hack.
I thought the __attribute__ ((weak)) would be enough to have the
sched_clock() in common.c get out of the way, and allow my board-specific
sched_clock() to be used. But that didn't work. What is the recommended
way to specify a board-specific function at compile time?
Thanks,
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists