[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090506034118.GC4416@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:11:18 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
agk@...hat.com, paolo.valente@...more.it, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
jmoyer@...hat.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, righi.andrea@...il.com
Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO Controller V2
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> [2009-05-05 13:24:41]:
> On Tue, 5 May 2009 15:58:27 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here is the V2 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30-rc4.
> > ...
> > Currently primarily two other IO controller proposals are out there.
> >
> > dm-ioband
> > ---------
> > This patch set is from Ryo Tsuruta from valinux.
> > ...
> > IO-throttling
> > -------------
> > This patch set is from Andrea Righi provides max bandwidth controller.
>
> I'm thinking we need to lock you guys in a room and come back in 15 minutes.
>
> Seriously, how are we to resolve this? We could lock me in a room and
> cmoe back in 15 days, but there's no reason to believe that I'd emerge
> with the best answer.
>
We are planning an IO mini-summit prior to the kernel summit
(hopefully we'll all be able to attend and decide).
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists