[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090507081924.GC12285@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:19:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3a] ptrace: add _ptrace_may_access()
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:32:24PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > Something like the patch below allows the reuse of the locked
> > > version of __ptrace_may_access and pushes the int->bool conversion
> > > into an inline.
> >
> > I think it would be cleaner and safe/simple enough to invert the public
> > ptrace_may_access() to just return the int and invert the ! on all the
> > callers (all one in fs/proc/task_mmu.c and all four in fs/proc/base.c).
>
> Yeah. And at the same time we might move it out of ptrace.c and
> give it a more descriptive name given that most users aren't
> related to ptrace in any way. may_inspect_task maybe? [...]
That name (due to the 'may') signals/suggests a bool property as
well, so if it has a retval==0 convention it's either incorrectly
named, or the return convention need to stay a bool.
> [...] I'm good at naming things..
not in this case ;-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists