[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090507085116.GC19133@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:51:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: How to use a different sched_clock() for ftrace on omap?
* Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've worked up a replacement sched_clock for ftrace on my omap
> platform. The current sched_clock, based on the 32K timer, has low
> resolution and doesn't provide very useful results.
hm, why dont you replace the real sched_clock() with it? High
resolution sched_clock() gives (much!) better scheduling, better
fairness, etc.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists