[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090507135911.GD481@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 15:59:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: How to use a different sched_clock() for ftrace on omap?
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've worked up a replacement sched_clock for ftrace on my omap
> > > platform. The current sched_clock, based on the 32K timer, has low
> > > resolution and doesn't provide very useful results.
> >
> > hm, why dont you replace the real sched_clock() with it? High
> > resolution sched_clock() gives (much!) better scheduling, better
> > fairness, etc.
>
> Probably because it is board specific, that he can not replace it. But I
> think something like Ryan's idea would be good. Instead of aliasing, just
> make another weak symbol.
>
>
> unsigned long long __attribute__((weak)) board_sched_clock(void)
> {
> [ original sched_clock code ]
> }
>
> unsigned long long sched_clock(void)
> {
> return board_sched_clock();
> }
>
> Then Tim could define a "board_sched_clock" that would be used
> when that board is active.
that sounds good. Weak aliases are now generally supported in Linux,
we excluded that one broken GCC version that messed them up.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists