[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A02FE91.8070006@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 08:30:25 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009 10:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
>> I think we need to reduce the general tick frequency to be as low as
>> possible. With high resolution timers the tick frequency is just the
>> frequency with which the timer interrupt disturbs a running application.
>>
>> Are there any benefits remaining from frequent timer interrupts? I would
>> think that 60 HZ would be sufficient.
>
> 50 works for various european video apps, 60 breaks, 60 works for various
> US video apps, 50 breaks. Now that may have changed with all the select
> stuff being hrtimer based (which I'd missed).
Hence 300 Hz. ;)
> Hooray - finally someone admits the *real* problem here, and for power
> management too. Otherwise known as "referencing jiffies as a variable must
> die"
Amen. Also, "using HZ as a unit of measurement must die, too."
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists