[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905070925500.8967@hp9800.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:28:41 -0600 (MDT)
From: Kenneth Crudup <kenny@...ix.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Given that distros ship uswsusp already... is that really an advantage.
Uswsusp has no compression. A suspend-to-disk that can take up to 5
minutes in uswsusp takes 20 seconds with TuxOnIce. Uswsusp has no built-
in hooks that allow me to run commands and set options during the suspend
and resume process.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles
O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists