[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905071352140.22107@qirst.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If there is a single process running on a processor and no other process
> > is contending then there is no need to do involuntary preemption.
>
> Sure, and CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK does that, the trick is getting it to not
> hurt others.
If other processors are scheduled on the processor then an IPI could
notify the scheduler over there to start timer interrupts for preemption
again.
I still see timer interrupts ongoing even with CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists