[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A033101.8050106@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:05:37 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>>
>>>> I guess technically mmio can just be a simple access of the page which
>>>> would be problematic to trap locally without a PF. However it seems
>>>> that most mmio always passes through a ioread()/iowrite() call so this
>>>> is perhaps the hook point. If we set the stake in the ground that
>>>> mmios
>>>> that go through some other mechanism like PFs can just hit the "slow
>>>> path" are an acceptable casualty, I think we can make that work.
>>>>
>>> That's my thinking exactly.
>>>
>>
>> Cool, I will code this up and submit it. While Im at it, Ill run it
>> through the "nullio" ringer, too. ;) It would be cool to see the
>> pv-mmio hit that 2.07us number. I can't think of any reason why this
>> will not be the case.
>>
>
> Don't - it's broken. It will also catch device assignment mmio and
> hypercall them.
>
Ah. Crap.
Would you be conducive if I continue along with the dynhc() approach then?
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (267 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists