[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090507215712.GI3036@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 14:57:12 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
* Gregory Haskins (gregory.haskins@...il.com) wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > pci_iomap could look at the bus device that the PCI function sits on.
> > If it detects a PCI bridge that has a certain property (config space
> > setting, vendor/device ID, ...), it assumes that the device itself
> > will be emulated and it should set the address flag for IO_COND.
> >
> > This implies that all pass-through devices need to be on a different
> > PCI bridge from the emulated devices, which should be fairly
> > straightforward to enforce.
Hmm, this gets to the grey area of the ABI. I think this would mean an
upgrade of the host would suddenly break when the mgmt tool does:
(qemu) pci_add pci_addr=0:6 host host=01:10.0
> Thats actually a pretty good idea.
>
> Chris, is that issue with the non ioread/iowrite access of a mangled
> pointer still an issue here? I would think so, but I am a bit fuzzy on
> whether there is still an issue of non-wrapped MMIO ever occuring.
Arnd was saying it's a bug for other reasons, so perhaps it would work
out fine.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists