[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090507145722.b2d89e11.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 14:57:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Harry Ciao <qingtao.cao@...driver.com>
Cc: norsk5@...oo.com, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v0 PATCH 1/1] Use dev_name() for AMD8111/AMD8131 EDAC driver
On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:47:38 +0800
Harry Ciao <qingtao.cao@...driver.com> wrote:
> The device structure no longer has bus_id member, dev_name() should
> be used for AMD8111 & AMD8131 EDAC driver instead. Also, their Makefile
> entries are lost, add them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Ciao <qingtao.cao@...driver.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/Makefile | 2 ++
> drivers/edac/amd8111_edac.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/edac/amd8131_edac.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Makefile b/drivers/edac/Makefile
> index a5fdcf0..5907681 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/edac/Makefile
> @@ -35,3 +35,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_MPC85XX) += mpc85xx_edac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_MV64X60) += mv64x60_edac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_CELL) += cell_edac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_PPC4XX) += ppc4xx_edac.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_AMD8111) += amd8111_edac.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_AMD8131) += amd8131_edac.o
hm, I wonder how that happened.
The drivers break x86-64 allmodconfig:
drivers/edac/amd8111_edac.c: In function 'amd8111_lpc_bridge_init':
drivers/edac/amd8111_edac.c:260: error: implicit declaration of function '__do_inb'
drivers/edac/amd8111_edac.c:274: error: implicit declaration of function '__do_outb'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists