| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200905080037.19722@centrum.cz> Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 00:37:39 +0200 From: <trekker.dk@...trum.cz> To: <tuxonice-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net> Cc: <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce Well... > > >To summarise disadvantages: > >- only core has 8000 LoC >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace). >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality. >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing > To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works. (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.) >_______________________________________________ >TuxOnIce-devel mailing list >TuxOnIce-devel@...ts.tuxonice.net >http://lists.tuxonice.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxonice-devel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists