[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090507030516.GA12763@localhost>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:05:16 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] proc: export more page flags in /proc/kpageflags
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:48:55AM +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:40:16AM +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, 07 May 2009 09:21:21 +0800
> > > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > + * pseudo flags for the well known (anonymous) memory mapped pages
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (!PageSlab(page) && page_mapped(page))
> > > > + u |= 1 << KPF_MMAP;
> > > > + if (PageAnon(page))
> > > > + u |= 1 << KPF_ANON;
> > >
> > > Why do you check PageSlab on user pages ?
> > > Is there any case that PageSlab == true && page_mapped == true ?
> >
> > Yes at least for SLUB: it reuses page->_mapcount, so page_mapped() is
> > meaningless for slab pages.
>
> this question and answer implies more comment required...
Good point. Updated comment to:
/*
* pseudo flags for the well known (anonymous) memory mapped pages
*
* Note that page->_mapcount is overloaded in SLOB/SLUB/SLQB, so the
* simple test in page_mapped() is not enough.
*/
if (!PageSlab(page) && page_mapped(page))
u |= 1 << KPF_MMAP;
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists